Submitted by Sinman1982 t3_yd9r8s in massachusetts
HaElfParagon t1_itrbbli wrote
Reply to comment by IrishTempa420 in There is no compromise with election deniers. And that’s the problem. by Sinman1982
Hillary was bitching about how the electoral college was a sham.
When she lost, she gave up like she was supposed to.
Kissfan07 t1_itrjnj7 wrote
So because she won the popular vote, the EC is a sham?? Dems carried on for months about abolishing the electoral college, something that has elected every president outside of assassinations. .
alongfield t1_itrmkox wrote
> So because she won the popular vote, the EC is a sham?
Yes, that's why it's a sham. In an actual democratic system, the most votes wins.
> Dems carried on for months about abolishing the electoral college
Yes, that's because it's a terrible idea that only serves a very vocal minority. None of them are saying "Let's storm the Capitol, execute the people we don't like, and then get rid of the EC.". That's just Republicans.
Kissfan07 t1_itshy62 wrote
Oh well, that’s how we elect presidents.
alongfield t1_itsppz3 wrote
Oh well, guess women and black people can't vote. Oh wait, they can, because you can change things that sucked in the original. Like the Electoral College and allowing political parties to exist.
Kissfan07 t1_itucj3u wrote
They do exist.
alongfield t1_itudp72 wrote
Yes, that's literally what I said. If you actually knew anything about the Constitution, you would've already known that.
HaElfParagon t1_itroeao wrote
The electoral college is a sham because it allows the president to be chosen by a small number of "elites" instead of the people, which is what should exist. Now, of course that's a matter of opinion. But to pretend Hillary tried staging an insurrection by bitching about the electoral college is intellectually dishonest.
Kissfan07 t1_itsi2m7 wrote
It’s not dishonest. All I heard for a year was how she won the popular vote, and how she should be president.
disco_t0ast t1_ittd4a4 wrote
That you are literally trying to equate an armed raid on the Capitol incited by the loser of the election with the express intent of disrupting a constitutionally mandated process (and harm elected officials) with someone being vocal about a corrupt and inequitable system if voting is fucking mind blowing.
Where can i get whatever the fuck you are smoking.
Kissfan07 t1_itucmkm wrote
You guys make it out like it was the civil war. A bunch of nut jobs went to the capitol. Wow.
disco_t0ast t1_itucxb0 wrote
You're attempting to normalize and excuse sedition.
Wow.
Kissfan07 t1_itw4nky wrote
Not really. Just saying it’s done and over with.
disco_t0ast t1_itw4wf3 wrote
So is 9/11. So is the Holocaust. Should we act like they weren't significant events in history because they're "done and over with"?
Kissfan07 t1_itw556k wrote
Likes it’s even close in comparison.
disco_t0ast t1_itwafyj wrote
It doesn't need to be close. They are all significant in their own ways.
Jfc I am wasting my time and energy with you, little fucking pandemic-denying, anti-science MAGAt-fueled pissant.
HaElfParagon t1_itxgq13 wrote
You're right, at least with 9/11 the organizer got what he had coming to him. Trump is unfortunately still walking a free man.
HaElfParagon t1_itxgnl1 wrote
To execute the vice president and violently force a despot to maintain power.
Finished that for you.
HaElfParagon t1_itxgk9y wrote
Right, all you heard for a year was bitching. Did anyone attempt an insurrection? No, only republicans have done so.
Kissfan07 t1_iu1x1t5 wrote
Not a big deal. Nothing was going to happen. You act like they were goi g to bring down DC.
HaElfParagon t1_iu47icq wrote
You've been really drinking the fox coolaid huh?
You realize they set up gallows specifically to publicly execute the vice president, right? just because they were horrifyingly incompetent doesn't mean they weren't trying to overthrow the government.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments