Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DumbshitOnTheRight t1_itryp2f wrote

Reply to comment by -Horatio_Alger_Jr- in There is no compromise with election deniers. And that’s the problem. by Sinman1982

Not it's not, because you're deliberately and dishonestly conflating "Voting machine security if you can get your hands on the innards are hackable" and "the election was compromised by hacked voting machines."

I've also noticed the "election deniers" (read: The people who thin without a shred of evidence that the votes tallied were compromised) also think those elected from the GOP should be unseated as well.

4

-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_its7i4q wrote

We had people calling Trump an illegitimate president without any proof of Russia interference for years before the investigation was complete. Are they "election deniers"? They had no evidence?

How about in 2001 when Rep. Waters objected and attempted to challenge the certification?

How about in 2005 when Rep. Jones and Sen. Boxer challenged and objected the certification for Bush due to "voter irregularities"?

How about in 2017 when House Demograts challenged the electoral vote?

Were they all election deniers also?

−1