Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

bubalusarnee t1_j0syoun wrote

Well there is a law saying excess revenue must be returned, and there is no law saying I93 south should be well maintained. That is the literal answer, hopefully you don't mind me being literal for a second.

44

fountain19 OP t1_j0tzg3f wrote

My point is no one needed the 100 or 200 or even even a thousand. We should have put it on the ballot like a question. Do we want the 3 billion returned or should we fix our infrastructure. This state is fiscally sound, and our infrastructure is bad. Not just 93 but the whole state.

−21

fountain19 OP t1_j0u323w wrote

Really? Its food for a few days. Or fix the infrastructure for everyone. Don't see the lol but everyone gotta add their 2 cents. Its literally a waste of money. Im not saying it doesn't help. But big picture waste of money.

−8

Lord-Eddard t1_j0u4p67 wrote

Interstate highways are federally funded I believe

5

Budget-Celebration-1 t1_j0ulv1r wrote

The biggest issue is the cost of maintaining the roads here. We are literally in the top 5 states for the cost per mile, if not the top 2. Thank the unions and state. It does amaze me how much we pay and just how crappy the worksmanship is.

3

fountain19 OP t1_j0ume9m wrote

Have you not been paying attention to the world lately? Surplus is a word we might not use again this decade.

Word edit

1

peteypaaaablo t1_j0v4qsg wrote

Have you not been paying attention to the world lately? We live in Massachusetts… Even if there was a pool of $25 billion to fix the roads with the state wouldn’t be able to resist the temptation to mismanage every dime of it. The roads would be left in the same condition but somehow there would be a group of contractors with friends on Beacon Hill that, after “competitive bidding processes” got $$PAID$$

2

chavery17 t1_j0v550d wrote

More taxes ain’t the answer. Move the tax money from other areas to more important ones. Most of our tax money we pay in is wasted

4

fountain19 OP t1_j0v5siq wrote

Agreed. My point was 3 billion thrown towards something is better then giving 4 million people money. Its helps. But a big project could have been more beneficial to the 4 million. No new tax was needed. We already had it. But we have crooked people running the state so we can't get it done I guess. That seems like a real bull s h I t answer. Anyway back to dodging pot holes

−2

PakkyT t1_j0wftig wrote

We're wicked sma'ht in MA so one of us is going to point out meaningless spelling /typo mistakes. That is the way. That and it's Reddit. By the way, I did grant you an English degree. You should see it in the mail next week.

2

what_comes_after_q t1_j0wpi67 wrote

That's not how cities work. Cities set a budget. In this case, Mass DOT would make this part of their request to the governor when he sets the budget. All money that comes in goes to the general fund, unless it is allocated to different parts of the budget (like gas tax revenue, for example). If there is too much money in the general fund, then by mass law it gets refunded to the tax payers.

2

Cmurph1106 t1_j0x2bw7 wrote

Saw this post last night and then drove it this morning to work, no joke it’s like driving on the surface of the moon Stoneham to Medford!

0

plawwell t1_j0ysaik wrote

We don't need to throw more money at the problems as enough is already spent on all this stuff. We need to understand why they can't fix the problems with the funding already.

1