BrickTheMonkey t1_jee1ai0 wrote
Reply to comment by kayasoul in [ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted]
Wdym context
kayasoul t1_jee1cht wrote
If the partner is between 14 and 18, it would be 14, otherwise 16
BrickTheMonkey t1_jee1f13 wrote
So if a minor is fucking a minor both of em must be 14 or more. But if an adult is fucking a minor the minor must be 16. Kinda weird ngl
kayasoul t1_jee1hya wrote
I guess it is comparable to the romeo and juliet clause in the US, if what I heard is a thing there?
BrickTheMonkey t1_jee1jri wrote
Im not from the us so im defenetly not the right person to ask but maybe idk
kayasoul t1_jee1n99 wrote
Same but afaik that clause is supposed to regulate teens, since who you gonna sue when both participants are minors? Both of them???
BrickTheMonkey t1_jee1vsr wrote
Prob both of em dont get sued or the older one gets sued
kayasoul t1_jee1xxz wrote
Don't think either of them can be charged, which is the point of the clause
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments