Submitted by Pcolocoful t3_z6kxsy in mildlyinteresting
Benu5 t1_iy7p6t6 wrote
Reply to comment by DJWGibson in A conversation on a bathroom wall by Pcolocoful
Because it's a process that would take AT LEAST a century, hence what contemporary societies are doing isn't particularly relevant.
Prison and Police Abolition is a goal to try and work towards gradually, not an overnight policy change, read the book.
DJWGibson t1_iy87kwn wrote
>Because it's a process that would take AT LEAST a century, hence what contemporary societies are doing isn't particularly relevant.
Which makes it outright impossible.
That's a longer term goal than any human society has attempted. 25 presidencies, 50 election cycles, and three or four generations. Reshaping society for a world we don't know the needs of. Will there even be a recognisable USA in 100 years?
Construction projects that take a decade are hard to manage, and they have a clear goal and blueprints.
>Prison and Police Abolition is a goal to try and work towards gradually, not an overnight policy change, read the book.
I'll buy prison abolishment. I think there are better ways to handle incarceration and rules breakers.
But police? You need someone to keep the peace. There's always going to be someone who breaks the rules. The job of policing needs to fall on someone. And if not a public police force then it becomes the job of the military OR private security firms and corporate security, which is dystopian as fuck.
Benu5 t1_iyakmp9 wrote
Read the book.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments