Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Givemeahippo t1_ja2qpgv wrote

They’re DCP files. You could get something like DCP-o-matic to convert it to mp4, but it would be very difficult to actually get ahold of a DCP from a theatre to begin with. Also, it’s just straight up not worth it.

12

niklasd2003 OP t1_ja2r31h wrote

Why would it not be worth it when the quality is way better? I mean, especially when you have a very good high end home theatre, then you could fully use your whole setup by using the highest format for best immersion (like what you get in a public theatre)

−3

Givemeahippo t1_ja2rijj wrote

The video quality isn’t any better. They’re either 3996x2160 (flat) or 4096x1716 (scope). A 4k blue Ray is 3840x2160.

6

Consistent-Annual268 t1_ja2s6ak wrote

The DCP would be very lightly compressed though. Even the best Blu-rays are compressed down to a 100GB disc. It might make a difference in very dark scenes where compression artifacts are most likely to be evident. But probably not worth it.

The other thing is that the DCP will likely contain 10+ audio channels. Now, whether there is any home theater system that can decode and play it (maybe a properly set up Dolby ATMOS system?) is TBD.

I know in the r/fanedits community there's a lot of stock placed in getting work print copies and 35mm open mattes of movies.

4

Chen_Geller t1_ja3crzw wrote

Up to a certain degree of compression, a video file is effectivelly loseless, though...

1

niklasd2003 OP t1_ja3msmx wrote

What exactly are work print copies and 35mm open mattes of movies?

1

Consistent-Annual268 t1_ja3t6lz wrote

Essentially, the full image frame as captured by the film or the digital camera sensor, usually in a tall 4:3 aspect ratio before being cropped down to a cinematic wide screen format (1.85:1, 2.35:1 etc.). So it shows off much more vertical space. To be fair, the director and cinematographer would compose the shots for the target aspect ratio, so the extra vertical space is usually visually uninteresting (sky, ground) because all the production design and composition will be set up for the frame they wanted to shoot. But purists are always after it for preservation reasons.

Also, of note to this discussion, it is typically very lightly compressed as it is the version intended to be used for post production and editing so is in the highest available quality.

3

niklasd2003 OP t1_ja2rrvm wrote

But don't they have a higher bitrate and advanced formats like IMAX/3D/HFR?

0