Submitted by nayapapaya t3_11eico2 in movies
Intelligent-Age2786 t1_jaejd52 wrote
Reply to comment by AlanMorlock in What would happen if no more superhero films were made for the foreseeable future? by nayapapaya
I’m not saying superhero movies aren’t the most guilty, I’m just saying they aren’t the only ones who are guilty. As the years go on there are more big names blockbusters that go on that keep making a shit ton of money, superhero movies obviously heavily included. I’m not saying superhero movies aren’t guilty of that cuz they definitely are, I’m just saying that they aren’t the only ones guilty.
AlanMorlock t1_jaejxhy wrote
Honestly outside of what, Fast and Furious, ther hasn't been much viable even among attempted blockbusters. That's the real absurdity of it.
Intelligent-Age2786 t1_jaeknae wrote
Some of the ones that have been guilty aren’t always franchise films but there have been some over the years that are, like Harry Potter, Avatar is gonna be a long running one, Fast and Furious as you said, Jurassic World, and if you’d consider it blockbusters the LOTR trilogy, obviously Star Wars, Pirates of the Caribbean, James Bond still makes a shit ton, Transformers, Mission Impossible, and the Hunger Games. Obviously superhero movies make a bunch more than a lot of these, but all these still make MASSIVE amounts of money, and are also guilty. And then there’s obviously some stand-alone blockbusters that are also guilty.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments