Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

redeggplant01 OP t1_j72viy9 wrote

Then you missed

"The “LEAP” model used by the consultants (Energy Futures Group of Hinesburg), which was developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute and funded by the Swedish government, plus numerous environmental groups and renewable energy proponents, is available to the public. But the actual data assumptions used by the consultants and the results produced by the LEAP model are not.

The Ethan Allen Institute’s recent open records request to the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources turned up nothing. According to the agency, the data used for all of the modeling and the detailed results were not part of the “deliverables” from the consultants who wrote the action plan. Thus no independent review of the costs and supposed benefits is possible. "

−2

ProlapsedMasshole t1_j730226 wrote

No I didn't. How does what you quoted counter that initial conclusion?

6

redeggplant01 OP t1_j7354y0 wrote

Then you missed

"The “LEAP” model used by the consultants (Energy Futures Group of Hinesburg), which was developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute and funded by the Swedish government, plus numerous environmental groups and renewable energy proponents, is available to the public. But the actual data assumptions used by the consultants and the results produced by the LEAP model are not.

The Ethan Allen Institute’s recent open records request to the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources turned up nothing. According to the agency, the data used for all of the modeling and the detailed results were not part of the “deliverables” from the consultants who wrote the action plan. Thus no independent review of the costs and supposed benefits is possible. "

−3

ProlapsedMasshole t1_j73ecjd wrote

No I didn't. How does what you quoted and bolded counter that initial conclusion?

See, I can copy, paste and add formatting too.

5