Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

UnfairAd7220 t1_j7y11uh wrote

Buses are cheaper, by far, than the operating and capital cost of bringing back rail.

That is no conspiracy.

0

Reubachi t1_j7ztq1g wrote

How often does a governing body use this logic? Not often.

Short term you’re right, but rail is orders of magnitude cheaper to maintain once established than even a brand new maintenance free bus fleet.

2

UnfairAd7220 t1_j82w5xb wrote

Not a chance. The capital cost on that last study was $200M. Fares wouldn't cover the operating expense and the state would be on the hook for $6M in outright subsidy. That doesn't include debt service.

On that basis, in terms of 'short' or 'long' term, 'cheap' doesn't get anywhere near the conversation.

1