Submitted by uzernaimed t3_yppwq0 in newhampshire
lMickNastyl t1_ivld6vn wrote
Reply to comment by ThunderySleep in Who got your vote? by uzernaimed
They did, but they didn't vote for him. If he is a good candidate then that should be a net positive for bolduc.
ThunderySleep t1_ivlvl9m wrote
It is a positive for Bolduc, why wouldn't it be?
I think you're missing the point.
lMickNastyl t1_ivlwn33 wrote
No, I know what you mean.
I could also have put it that it is a net positive for the GOP not just bolduc personally, if he is a good and electable candidate.
ThunderySleep t1_ivlwu1l wrote
Yeah, that's the possibility of it backfiring, which I do think is a serious possibility.
lMickNastyl t1_ivlxd5w wrote
Oh it definitely has the possibility, and it has in special runoff elections already. Tomorrow we will find out if this ballsy strategy paid off or blew up in their faces.
My prediction is that there will be instances where it does blow up but there will be more on average where it worked.
But maybe tomorrow I sound stupid.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments