Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Qbncgr t1_iwpwyqx wrote

Reply to comment by realnrh in NH statehouse election cannot get any closer by GraniteGeekNH

Part 2, Art 5 reads in part: “provide by fixed laws for the naming and settling, all civil officers within this state, such officers excepted, the election and appointment of whom are hereafter in this form of government otherwise provided for;…”

And then the best I can find is RSA 660.24 https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/search/default.aspx

So it looks like 660.24 points to the constitution and P2Art5 gives them the authority.

It’s weird because a Senate tie is clearly spelled out in the constitution: [Art.] 34. [Vacancies in Senate, How Filled.] And in case there shall not appear to be a senator elected, by a plurality of votes, for any district, the deficiency shall be supplied in the following manner, viz. The members of the house of representatives, and such senators as shall be declared elected, shall take the names of the two persons having the highest number of votes in the district, and out of them shall elect, by joint ballot, the senator wanted for such district; and in this manner all such vacancies shall be filled up

3

realnrh t1_iwq2gul wrote

That's exactly the point I got to. It's very specific about Senate ties, but not about what the procedure is for ties in the House. I agree that it's weird, and that was why I wondered if I was just overlooking some relevant section.

3