For HB264, here's what would be required instead of surgery:
>""a new birth record shall be prepared to reflect a change in the individual's gender upon receipt of a notarized certification by a licensed and qualified health care provider affirming the individual's gender designation.
>The notarized certification shall be signed by a licensed and qualified health care provider under the penalty of RSA 5-C:14. It shall provide that the named individual is currently or was previously under the signing health care provider's care, and that in the health care provider's professional opinion the individual's gender is male or female and can be reasonably expected to continue as such for the foreseeable future.""

Honestly I'm a bit confused abt the m or f considering new Hampshire has the option of X now, but you can't just walk in and get one, there's still some hoops to go through. Also, 296 would be subpoenas regarding trans care specifically rather than like ALL, if a trans person is under investigation for murder they'll obviously still look into it