Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_iy3ldjo wrote

−14

diggstownjoe t1_iy3noby wrote

It's not always a bad thing, but it's often a bad thing, especially in non-unionized workplaces. At a certain scale, employees become interchangeable "human resources," just pieces on a game board. We'd be better off if our federal, state, and local governments made it easier for small businesses to operate and compete with larger businesses. Competition is the key to unlocking the benefits of capitalism, but ironically, it takes government regulation to ensure that competition isn't just squashed by monopolies and oligopolies.

15

OttoBaker t1_iy5wzlx wrote

Small businesses can’t compete with larger companies for healthcare and other benefits, nor with the online retail. Small businesses in the USA are best suited with an owner, and maybe only the owner, actually working behind the counter. Maybe it’s not a good idea to leave your customers in the hands of a minimum wager, who could care less about your success or failure. Customer service from anyone other than the owner is usually non-existent. I can’t stand to hear small business owners complain ad nauseam about the government when they are not even minding their shop. Some have no real business plan. Example: walk into a downtown clothing boutique and good luck getting a greeting, assistance, or answers to questions. They can’t even bother to clean the sidewalks. It’s a 180 of what I’ve experienced in Europe yet the popular opinion is that European countries make it impossible for small businesses. Don’t get me started on window displays.

1