Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

yxwvut t1_j986j0k wrote

Reply to comment by TogepiMain in Review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s research, colleagues allege by ScoMoTrudeauApricot

Preregistration is great but even pre-registering isn’t a panacea. Pre-registered papers can still be silently dropped from publication so the macro paper-generating process still has an over-abundance of false positives if the negatives are dropped, and there can still be ambiguities in the analysis protocol where researchers can still impart influence over the results.

3

TogepiMain t1_j9a6btk wrote

True. But even if the paper isn't published the timestamp of the hypothesis is there

1