Supreme Court sides with Arizona death row inmate seeking to challenge sentence in federal court cnn.com Submitted by AudibleNod t3_1195pjt on February 22, 2023 at 5:31 PM in news 54 comments 827
PEVEI t1_j9l2qs2 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 7:29 PM Reply to comment by RSquared in Supreme Court sides with Arizona death row inmate seeking to challenge sentence in federal court by AudibleNod Well you have to remember who those four are, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett, who are all basically human ham steaks. Permalink Parent 48 justforthearticles20 t1_j9ldfub wrote on February 22, 2023 at 8:35 PM Those four just sit there sounding like Beevis saying "Kill, Kill, Kill, Kill" Permalink Parent 19 PEVEI t1_j9lf4jo wrote on February 22, 2023 at 8:45 PM Tbh Coney Barrett looks like the sort who chants that when someone cuts her off in traffic! Cold DEAD eyes. Permalink Parent 8 NomDePlume007 t1_j9lxqt2 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 10:41 PM No surprise at all that she wrote the dissent. Edit: added link to decision. Permalink Parent 4 SanityIsOptional t1_j9ntcng wrote on February 23, 2023 at 8:17 AM Wait, Kavanaugh was the dissenter? Really? I figured it would have been Gorsuch of the 5. Permalink Parent 2 DrakeBurroughs t1_j9oihq0 wrote on February 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM No, this tracks. Kavanaugh seems to generally be in favor of USSC rules overriding states. This tracks. What’s surprising is that Gorsuch didn’t join the majority. That strikes me as odd. Permalink Parent 4 [deleted] t1_j9mmhnu wrote on February 23, 2023 at 1:35 AM [removed] Permalink Parent 1
justforthearticles20 t1_j9ldfub wrote on February 22, 2023 at 8:35 PM Those four just sit there sounding like Beevis saying "Kill, Kill, Kill, Kill" Permalink Parent 19 PEVEI t1_j9lf4jo wrote on February 22, 2023 at 8:45 PM Tbh Coney Barrett looks like the sort who chants that when someone cuts her off in traffic! Cold DEAD eyes. Permalink Parent 8 NomDePlume007 t1_j9lxqt2 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 10:41 PM No surprise at all that she wrote the dissent. Edit: added link to decision. Permalink Parent 4
PEVEI t1_j9lf4jo wrote on February 22, 2023 at 8:45 PM Tbh Coney Barrett looks like the sort who chants that when someone cuts her off in traffic! Cold DEAD eyes. Permalink Parent 8 NomDePlume007 t1_j9lxqt2 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 10:41 PM No surprise at all that she wrote the dissent. Edit: added link to decision. Permalink Parent 4
NomDePlume007 t1_j9lxqt2 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 10:41 PM No surprise at all that she wrote the dissent. Edit: added link to decision. Permalink Parent 4
SanityIsOptional t1_j9ntcng wrote on February 23, 2023 at 8:17 AM Wait, Kavanaugh was the dissenter? Really? I figured it would have been Gorsuch of the 5. Permalink Parent 2 DrakeBurroughs t1_j9oihq0 wrote on February 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM No, this tracks. Kavanaugh seems to generally be in favor of USSC rules overriding states. This tracks. What’s surprising is that Gorsuch didn’t join the majority. That strikes me as odd. Permalink Parent 4
DrakeBurroughs t1_j9oihq0 wrote on February 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM No, this tracks. Kavanaugh seems to generally be in favor of USSC rules overriding states. This tracks. What’s surprising is that Gorsuch didn’t join the majority. That strikes me as odd. Permalink Parent 4
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments