Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_jabcezl wrote

Reply to comment by MajesticOuting in Little-known scientific team behind new assessment on covid-19 origins by asdf3

[removed]

−24

sexisfun1986 t1_jabhgkz wrote

The lab was built there because the area was the source of other serious infections that spread globally.

You also think volcanology detection facilities cause volcanoes to erupt?

26

[deleted] t1_jac1749 wrote

[removed]

−5

crlb2525 t1_jackiaa wrote

If we apply Occam's razor you’re right. Simplest answer is a mistake at the lab.

−5

sexisfun1986 t1_jae8516 wrote

No it’s not. Pandemics have occurred countless times before the only thing close to a pandemic occurring because of a “lab leak” was a possible production failure with a wide spread vaccine program, as in millions of failure points.

This region has already been the source of past global infections.

So a natural process that has resulted in multiple past incidents including some in this specific spot, is the simplest explanation.

Adding an extra step to a known process a lab leak which also does not have a record of causing a such an occurrence is the definition of adding complexity

2

crlb2525 t1_jaekn9f wrote

Aside from the "hey, it came from a wet market that doesn't sell the animals.....

What was that about adding complexity?

−2

sexisfun1986 t1_jaemy3i wrote

No yeah a hundred percent random markets procedures are way more absolute then labourites. There is no chance that a market might have different offerings at different times and they are always perfectly recorded . /S

Hey fun fact zoonosis occurs whit contact to animals by humans not from stocked shelves.

2

[deleted] t1_jaenlsq wrote

[removed]

−2

sexisfun1986 t1_jaf2mmj wrote

LoL, Jesus Christ zoonosis is the way this has happened multiple multiple times this the way this the standard method there is no add complexity.

Also again the lab was built there because everyone realized this was going to happen again you know because this happened before, as in before the lab was built.

Let me guess you also think volcanic eruptions are caused by volcanology research facilities.

3

No_Improvement7573 t1_jabftk8 wrote

"Right next door" is a weird way to say "miles away"

21

[deleted] t1_jac014f wrote

[removed]

−6

No_Improvement7573 t1_jacouhv wrote

Give it a rest, shitdick. I don't pretend to know what happened but I know it wasn't [insert fringe conspiracy theory]. Find a better way to entertain yourself.

5

Agent_Angelo_Pappas t1_jac4hk6 wrote

You don’t think it’s curious that when the earliest cases are plotted they create a bullseye pattern centered on the market and show no apparent geographic relation to the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the neighborhoods where its employees worked/lived?

Do you not find it curious that when looking at initial sampling researchers actually found the pattern of viral particles increased in concentration near the area of the market where butchering was occurring?

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp871

What’s most curious to me is how it seems like infectious disease experts and epidemiologists are overwhelmingly in agreement it seems most likely this was a typical zoonotic transfer, and it’s only politically driven government agencies in completely unrelated fields like Energy that are pushing accusations on the lab with vague reasoning.

16