ChibiRay t1_jdbzz1f wrote
I don't understand why something like this is necessary in the first place. This sounds like something capitalism would naturally work through on its own. If fees are too high, then the consumers would choose to not order through Uber? If fees hurt restaurants too much, then restaurants can choose to not do business through Uber. If delivery drivers aren't getting paid to their satisfaction, they can choose to not work for Uber? I don't understand why these legislations keeps coming up trying to regulate how a business should do its business. If it's really a shit business and everyone else is getting the short end of the stick, then that business would naturally go bankrupt when people choose to leave and if those people continue to choose to work with that business, then it's on them and I don't think they have the right to complain...
kandoras t1_jdcn7dw wrote
>If fees hurt restaurants too much, then restaurants can choose to not do business through Uber.
Uber and Doordash will list restaurants in their services even if the restaurant tells them not to.
dem89 t1_jdcwxbv wrote
You're expecting capitalism, which constantly needs government bailout, to sort this out? How's that boot taste? Oh, who am I kidding, you love the taste.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments