kenlasalle t1_jdxjg8j wrote
From the people who brought you "This has to end at 5 billion" and "Absolutetly no more than 7, we think. Bob says 7.4."
money_loo t1_jdy2jzz wrote
Yes, scientists adapt and evolve and argue amongst each other for the most up to date information.
Some people like that.
On-mountain-time t1_jdy6noz wrote
That doesn't sound smart. We should definitely pick a position, and stick with it regardless of new information or models. /s
110397 t1_jdz3u9w wrote
Maybe write it down in a book that doesn’t change for 2000+ years
spleddittor t1_jdymiip wrote
Guys, it’s at 8.7 billion now…
Excludos t1_jdzrgyx wrote
Motherfu..I told you no more than 7.4! I can stretch to 7.8, but that's as far as I'm willing to go. You can't have it your way just because you have the latest data
[deleted] t1_jdy7rl3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdyil8b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdyoszt wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdys1ys wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdyxb73 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdzsuk0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je021m6 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments