Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

phunkydroid t1_je075v9 wrote

I'm amazed you keep commenting without reading past the headline.

3

patman_007 t1_je0ntl3 wrote

I'm not commenting on what the article was stating, just pointing out that growth rate and population total are two separate things.

1

phunkydroid t1_je0rrq0 wrote

>I'm not commenting on what the article was stating

Then why did you say:

>No, they're saying the rate at which the population will grow will peak at 8.6 billion people LMAO.

​

> just pointing out that growth rate and population total are two separate things.

Which is what the first person in this thread said when you got snarky with them. The headline says rate, but the article clearly talks about the overall population, despite the word rate being incorrectly used.

The rate peaked already. It's in decline now. The article is about the population peaking in 2050 and then declining for the second half of the century to 7 billion by 2100. Total, not the rate.

1