Man accused of violating no-contact order with woman who’s now missing in Vancouver, WA columbian.com Submitted by bruisescold t3_11yxec4 on March 22, 2023 at 9:30 PM in news 41 comments 519
theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcjrbu wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:54 PM Reply to comment by Ratnix in Man accused of violating no-contact order with woman who’s now missing in Vancouver, WA by bruisescold >The question really is, how was he able to leave the state? My guess is by car. I’m sure he was required to stay in the state. Permalink Parent 2 Ratnix t1_jdck7tf wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:58 PM Right, but the RO should have been enough to let them know he left the state and a warrant should have been issued. Permalink Parent 3 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdckayq wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Do we know he didn’t have one? Permalink Parent 2 Ratnix t1_jdcnumr wrote on March 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM Don't they serve them with papers when they have a RO against them? I assume they do, else how would someone know about it? And if they served him with the RO, then they could have arrested him right then. Permalink Parent 2 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcx184 wrote on March 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM If they knew about it and was flagged if they looked it up. Permalink Parent 1
Ratnix t1_jdck7tf wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:58 PM Right, but the RO should have been enough to let them know he left the state and a warrant should have been issued. Permalink Parent 3 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdckayq wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Do we know he didn’t have one? Permalink Parent 2 Ratnix t1_jdcnumr wrote on March 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM Don't they serve them with papers when they have a RO against them? I assume they do, else how would someone know about it? And if they served him with the RO, then they could have arrested him right then. Permalink Parent 2 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcx184 wrote on March 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM If they knew about it and was flagged if they looked it up. Permalink Parent 1
theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdckayq wrote on March 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Do we know he didn’t have one? Permalink Parent 2 Ratnix t1_jdcnumr wrote on March 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM Don't they serve them with papers when they have a RO against them? I assume they do, else how would someone know about it? And if they served him with the RO, then they could have arrested him right then. Permalink Parent 2 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcx184 wrote on March 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM If they knew about it and was flagged if they looked it up. Permalink Parent 1
Ratnix t1_jdcnumr wrote on March 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM Don't they serve them with papers when they have a RO against them? I assume they do, else how would someone know about it? And if they served him with the RO, then they could have arrested him right then. Permalink Parent 2 theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcx184 wrote on March 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM If they knew about it and was flagged if they looked it up. Permalink Parent 1
theonlyonethatknocks t1_jdcx184 wrote on March 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM If they knew about it and was flagged if they looked it up. Permalink Parent 1
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments