Submitted by AudibleNod t3_127ud26 in news
Krandor1 t1_jegrmar wrote
Reply to comment by DeficiencyOfGravitas in 'Rust' first assistant director David Halls sentenced in deadly on-set shooting by AudibleNod
If the armorer does her job right a loaded gun is never in baldwins hand. Gun safety on set literally is her job. She failed. Baldwin is partially responsible but if she follows procedures there are never ever live rounds on set to get into the gun in the first place. Thst is the reason you have an armorer.
[deleted] t1_jegvw35 wrote
[removed]
GI_X_JACK t1_jegt89e wrote
From what has previously been posted. This is the armorer Baldwin hired, and then ignored because it was more or less his set. From what other people have said. Baldwin didn't let her do her job correctly. She was hired because she was cheap, and new.
Less_Tennis5174524 t1_jegzbsw wrote
"What other people said" or in other words bullshit. We dont really know anything about his involvement at all. He has a producer credit but that could just be ego padding.
GI_X_JACK t1_jeh0bq1 wrote
He also co-wrote the script.
Again, we'll see what people are willing to say in court.
DeficiencyOfGravitas t1_jegs83f wrote
Every gun you receive is assume loaded until you check it yourself. There is no trust system in firearm safety. Only Hollywood operates with the "Bro, dude, I totally checked it, just point it at her and pull the trigger, bro, it's safe" system.
Rnevermore t1_jegz4xn wrote
Standard gun safety rules do not apply on a movie set... This should be REALLY obvious. Movie sets use a completely different set of rules, and they seem to work fine because Hollywood has a much lower than average rate of incidents.
Medievalhorde t1_jegsq5w wrote
You have to convince twelve other people to think your way and if most are not blaming Alec Baldwin before the trial, I don't see a snowball chance in hell of twelve people aligning that way either.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments