Submitted by PhillipCrawfordJr t3_120ziz4 in news
ankylosaurus_tail t1_jdn1hz6 wrote
Reply to comment by Schiffy94 in Darcelle, world's oldest working drag queen, dies at 92 by PhillipCrawfordJr
So did Lou Reed and David Bowie, and it didn't hurt them much.
Schiffy94 t1_jdn1ruf wrote
In fairness no one can explain David Bowie. Not even David Bowie.
Grizlyfrontbum t1_jdncw51 wrote
Lori Maddox and Sable Starr can. He allegedly took the former’s virginity when she was 14.
Schiffy94 t1_jdnf7px wrote
That's something she said in one interview, yet in another she claims the two of them snuck into his hotel room uninvited and initiated the encounter.
I'm no victim blamer but she seems to have willingly self-identified as the offender in one instance. At the very least, that's weird.
Grizlyfrontbum t1_jdnfq87 wrote
Well, it could come off as victim blaming. Certain celebrities get a pass it seems. If she was 14 she was incapable of consent. How could she be the offender at 14? Honest question. The truth is, certain people seem to get a pass, depending on which side of certain arguments they fall on. Which is the really weird thing.
Schiffy94 t1_jdngkmb wrote
There's a gray area if her account of him being tired is accurate. If an adult and a minor both appear to "consent", then it's statutory rape on the part of the adult hands down.
But what if the adult in the situation doesn't consent? What if the minor initiates against the adult's will? If he was in fact tired, or even not alert enough to consent, we tread into a territory where the age of reason matters more than the age of consent.
Hypothetically, what if a minor were to roofie and adult and have sex with them? Who's the offender there?
[deleted] t1_jdnir1l wrote
[removed]
Grizlyfrontbum t1_jdnhnud wrote
Well we can guess that he was never alert with all the drugs, however I actually agree with you. I’m more calling out the ridiculous ways people try to make it ok in some instances and not others. I think that a 14 year old knows enough between right and wrong. So do most courts in regard to murder sentences when deciding to charge as an adult. Either they’re capable of knowing right from wrong or they’re not. The severity of the crime shouldn’t be the deciding factor on whether they are an adult or not. In your hypothetical scenario, I have had this same thought as well. I think that the current state of our system would place the blame on the adult, even when incapacitated. Which is ridiculous.
Edited to include what I read. Doesn’t seem he was incapable of consent. Obviously there are multiple stories.
[deleted] t1_jdol5a9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdni41i wrote
[removed]
Schiffy94 t1_jdnijm3 wrote
Way to completely ignore my next comment.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments