Submitted by preppythugg t3_xxdfei in news
[deleted] t1_irbgfju wrote
[removed]
IateYOURmommasTACO t1_irbgvwd wrote
First amendment?
SomeDEGuy t1_irc53gp wrote
Having the government review your speech to make sure it meets their standards before granting a license would be the first amendment issue.
It required applicants to turn over social media accounts for review when applying.
IkLms t1_irgd5lm wrote
The "Good Moral Character" clause is also highly suspect as well because you damn well know that'll be used to deny people of religions that the decision maker doesn't like, and for people who are of minority groups and likely those people who criticize the Government or police as well.
[deleted] t1_irce99m wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ircfm9b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_irbgxaj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_irbkxgo wrote
[removed]
OGSquidFucker t1_irbi2ts wrote
Yes. Guns come first. Everything else is second.
richalex2010 t1_irdup98 wrote
No, first amendment was right, freedom of speech - this law required police to review people's social media prior to issuing an application, meaning that there's a significant chilling effect on speech if you know that cops are going to be combing through your posts trying to find a reason to deny your second amendment right (also note that the reason to deny was at their discretion, there was no objective standard for "problematic" posts).
[deleted] t1_irbi9ke wrote
[removed]
strugglz t1_irbybyh wrote
Effectively that's true, but it's also pathetic of a nation that claims to be the best.
[deleted] t1_irce3ix wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments