another-masked-hero t1_iugqq5t wrote
Reply to comment by megalon43 in Richard Branson declines invitation to debate death penalty with Shanmugam, says TV format 'turns serious debate into spectacle' by chronoistriggered
If done properly (i.e. correctly argumented) I think this would be awesome.
But it seems very flawed. This could be my ignorance but paragraphs 13-17 are logically flawed or suspicious (for example paragraph 12-13: accusation that there are biased in the system, then contradicting “proof” Is that the system itself cleared itself of wrongdoings). I then stopped reading because it seemed like a waste of time.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments