Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Helenium_autumnale t1_ise4966 wrote

It's a holdover from the pre-Internet age, like travel agents. We don't need them. They're parasites who often know nothing about the properties they're showing (in my recent experience; my middling research found a problematic sewer field though the house salesman had no idea where it was located) who nevertheless want to siphon off some money. Useless people.

16

BrownienMotion t1_iseihmn wrote

Imo there is a huge conflict of interest, the selling realtor is supposed to represent the buyer but is compensated by the buyer paying more money.

7

MutantMartian t1_isez2a6 wrote

The agent for the buyer is representing the buyer but is compensated more by the buyer spending more money. I think that’s what you meant. This is why they don’t negotiate.

5

BrownienMotion t1_isf2e2n wrote

In my state, the agent representing the buyer is technically called the "selling agent", whereas the seller's agent is the "listing agent". Most people probably refer to them as buyer/seller's agent, but I think it's important to make the emphasis that the selling agent (representing buyer) is trying to sell them properties.

Source: I thought the system was broken so I got a real estate license and found out it was even worse than I had thought.

4