Submitted by Semper-Fido t3_y86xll in news
lumentec t1_isz70fk wrote
Can the media please stop using the word jab? It's actively harmful to public perception and it sounds dumb in a formal setting.
Responsible_Tell1589 t1_iszc901 wrote
It’s a British word/term innet?
kwangqengelele t1_iszfn9o wrote
It is, it became commonly seen in antivax conservative circles in America because a lot of the sources of their antivax political nonsense learned English in Europe.
[deleted] t1_iszgwrw wrote
[deleted]
samus12345 t1_iszn1wq wrote
Yeah, I know it just means "shot" in British English, but because of its connection with anti-vaxxers I'm not too keen on it becoming a thing here.
Just-Some-Reddit-Guy t1_it1n7mf wrote
Don’t read news from a British outlet then.
Iam4c t1_it1zkpy wrote
words like science, vaccine, immune system? Lets not pander
katsukare t1_it0dhhx wrote
You think shot sounds better? Also check the source.
PoignantOpinionsOnly t1_it1ipxl wrote
Americans are used to hearing the word "shot."
Badum... tiss
lumentec t1_it4n1ff wrote
Didn't say shot. How about vaccine? Like the real word for it, not slang. :P
katsukare t1_it5cdzh wrote
Vaccine or jab are both real words. It’s a normal thing to say in the UK and other countries.
[deleted] t1_it5fuzl wrote
[deleted]
katsukare t1_it5jzb4 wrote
No reputable publication is going to cater to Americans getting upset over a word. Sorry.
cedarapple t1_iszgtip wrote
Particularly since the needle used for the vaccine is tiny and I barely have even felt the shots. My arm was a bit sore several hours later but the shot itself is nothing.
mart1373 t1_it0gqaq wrote
Jib Jab
[deleted] t1_it0tqcl wrote
[removed]
logos1020 t1_it16aun wrote
Jab sounds more benign to me than shot. They can both be used to describe attacks so I don't see too big a difference.
couchmaster518 t1_iszoc61 wrote
Can UK news also drop “boffin” (or rather, “BOFFIN”)?
[deleted] t1_iszg1z2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_it00dv9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itcnc3f wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_it01rd8 wrote
[removed]
lumentec t1_it0299x wrote
They very much do drastically slow the spread of disease chief, including COVID - in addition to reducing the severity of disease when it still occurs.
[deleted] t1_it03ikm wrote
[removed]
lumentec t1_it057vk wrote
That's incorrect. It's not like in Plague Inc. Lower severity in this context refers to the chance of death from someone who contracts it, which was high early on with COVID, as everyone is aware.
For those who aren't at high risk of death, lower severity means they have a lower viral load, and consequently they are less infectious to others. In fact, since COVID has historically been potentially infectious to others for a few days before significant symptoms are developed, your analogy is even less relevant.
[deleted] t1_it0ald1 wrote
[removed]
Shpad01nkle t1_it139td wrote
I try to tell people this all the time and most people outside of reddit can understand.
If someone doesn’t feel sick, they are more likely to be less cautious and go outside. Esp if they feel so well they have no idea they are contagious.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments