Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

flanderguitar t1_iun9s7a wrote

It's too expensive for the state to conserve. Also, the water levels will submerge it once again soon.

Maybe some activist will glue their hand to it or something?

14

[deleted] t1_iuna833 wrote

[removed]

21

Delicious-Day-3614 t1_iunwz1u wrote

Because the people writing the article did not intend for you to realize they weren't literally destroying millions of dollars of art.

13

Noisy_Toy t1_iuoujwc wrote

Yep. And everyone says “why didn’t they target corp buildings first?” They did. They didn’t make international news until they targeted the artwork.

2

flanderguitar t1_iunb0tq wrote

I remember someone recommended the galleries just take the paintings out of the case and leave the glued loser as its own art piece. lol

8