nsanity27 t1_ivfb6ah wrote
Reply to comment by shariewayne in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
In 1981 federal air traffic controllers went on strike citing long hours and low pay after rejecting a contract put forth by the FAA, their employers. The President at the time was Reagan who was very much on the side of management and publicly stated that those who were striking were violating their contract and would be terminated. The US federal government was the boss in that situation and could fire at will any employee. About 11,000 people were fired and this set a precedent.
With the current rail strike it’s a little different. The workers are not federal employees but do work in an absolutely essential industry. Thus, any disruptions to the industry would result in a national emergency with food rotting, goods remaining at factories, imports and exports halted, etc. In a national emergency, our government has nearly limitless power (see Bush’s “wartime” presidency and the invasion of Iraq) and the Biden administration is using the inevitable emergency declaration if a strike occurs to step in now and try to mediate a deal. They brokered a deal between management and union leaders that favored the management position and only includes one scheduled day off per MONTH (you get at least 8 from weekends in any other industry) and said that’s the best we can do. Union leadership is forced to bring it to a vote amongst members which is getting rejected as we speak. So, they’re going to strike and it will be a huge test to the Biden presidency with most likely an opposition controlled legislature whether he will follow in Reagan’s footsteps to crush the strike and force people to work under those conditions or come down on management and revoke their federal contracts unless they give in to the workers.
I know this is a long answer and has a lot more background info than you probably though you needed, but it all boils down to our federal gov’t has historically been in favor of business interests and has heavily legislated and governed in that manner for the last 40 years after Reagan and his handling of the PATCO strike.
MacDerfus t1_ivgc4wz wrote
Unless the strike literally begins right now, all the votes will have been cast before any effect of the strike is felt.
Also, who's gonna step in if enough rail workers decide to become former rail workers?
Edg4rAllanBro t1_ivi4xso wrote
> Also, who's gonna step in if enough rail workers decide to become former rail workers?
This is a really interesting question because there isn't a branch of the military dedicated to railroads like they are with aircraft. Maybe some part of the army corps of the engineer, but I vaguely remember hearing BNSF planned on having its white collar workers drive trains in the event of a strike.
They tried doing this during the John Deere strike and a few ambulances had to be dispatched, so I'm excited to see the results of making an accountant drive a mile long train alone.
SnooOranges3546 t1_ivi5qzb wrote
You shouldn't be. It's not the accountant that's going to get hurt. It's whatever town a hazmat train derails in.
Edg4rAllanBro t1_iviay6y wrote
Any hazmat trains running during a strike is irresponsible, that's their fault.
[deleted] t1_ivjm451 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments