cheepcheepimasheep t1_ivgn377 wrote
Reply to comment by WET318 in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
But that's already a thing. A contract is legally binding, so there are already ramifications for breaching contracts.
Should companies be able to sue unions or individuals for loss of profits with no breach of contract by the union?
Because that's what's at stake here in the coming SCOTUS hearing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments