Submitted by totallyclips t3_zta91i in news
IvetRockbottom t1_j1cow7f wrote
Reply to comment by macross1984 in The 17 findings in the January 6 committee’s final report by totallyclips
That was already known the day he was elected.
macross1984 t1_j1ct0uz wrote
The last presidential ranking Trump surprisingly was not dead last. That "honor" went to James Buchanan though Trump was ranked 41 out of 44.
https://worldnewsera.com/news/politics/presidents-ranked-from-worst-to-best/
TheThebanProphet t1_j1d0s4d wrote
Hard to beat the guy that let the union faulter but he's getting there
Rickshmitt t1_j1d3fcp wrote
Oh he tried overthrowing it. Sounds kinda worse
EmotionalSuportPenis t1_j1e29gy wrote
Buchanan's leadership, or more correctly his near total lack of leadership, is generally cited as one of the primary contributing factors to the outbreak of the Civil War. He refused to take a stance either way or undertake any action on the question of slavery at a critical moment in American history, deliberately kicking the can down the road to whoever was president after him, which turned out to be Lincoln. By the time Lincoln took office, years of inaction had allowed tensions to spiral out of control and effectively guaranteed the occurrence of the Civil War, when careful statesmanship years earlier may have prevented the worst.
Nobody's taking Buchanan's spot at the bottom until they manage to split the country in half and get 2% of the American population killed in an armed conflict again, which would be 6.7 million people right now.
[deleted] t1_j1fx5g8 wrote
[removed]
TheThebanProphet t1_j1e07u7 wrote
Time will tell with these things. I agree with your sentiment.
KejsarePDX t1_j1dtv4c wrote
I loudly said to my family after Jan 6 that Buchanan has a new candidate to run for last place.
VenserSojo t1_j1d4ol9 wrote
How the hell is Woodrow Wilson not in the bottom 5?
Professional-Can1385 t1_j1d96hz wrote
I’m surprised how highly Andrew Jackson is ranked. One would think ignoring the Supreme Court and genocide would lower his ranking.
Painting_Agency t1_j1d9v9m wrote
Indigenous genocide is as American as apple pie.
TogepiMain t1_j1dugtk wrote
But Apple Pie is Dutch
cantuse t1_j1e3fi5 wrote
A lot of historians rank a President based on their abilities to execute their office and their impact on the country relative to their place in US and world history. Jackson tends to get high ratings because of his impact on things like central banking, the spoils system, how he changed the significance of the executive branch. He may have been an ugly person but he was able to find ways to achieve a lot of his goals.
Professional-Can1385 t1_j1eoy8a wrote
he did a great job of achieving his goal of ethnic cleansing.
Jasmine1742 t1_j1g7rv1 wrote
Let's not kid ourselves, the American goal of ethnic cleansing. Alot of Americans wanted him to do what he did.
Jackson tends to get rated highly for being a populist who did alot of important reforms while in office. This most noticiably doesn't mean he was a good person.
KejsarePDX t1_j1du17y wrote
Wartime president gets a bit of pass.
[deleted] t1_j1e423t wrote
[removed]
Professional-Can1385 t1_j1d8hiv wrote
We still haven’t seen the full impact of his shit-show of a presidency. He could still move down.
Question: Trump is 45, why did they only rank 44?
supercrooky t1_j1dk5z3 wrote
The numbering that has Trump #45 has Grover Cleveland #22 and #24, as his terms weren't back to back. Only 44 people have been president.
Professional-Can1385 t1_j1eoq8d wrote
Of course! I forget about old Grover Cleveland.
ViciousKnids t1_j1dlrw1 wrote
Because we've only had 44, but Grover Cleveland won non-consecutive terms. Hence he was the 22nd and 24th president.
[deleted] t1_j1dczki wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1df12q wrote
[removed]
JanitorKarl t1_j1dx3e2 wrote
One pres was only in office for a month - they don't rank him
[deleted] t1_j1d9mr3 wrote
[deleted]
dbt45 t1_j1dcnfm wrote
Is it because Garfield is 22 and 24?
Ed: oops, turns out it's Grover Cleveland
macross1984 t1_j1f0dy2 wrote
That's right. I had forgotten about that.
[deleted] t1_j1df7jb wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j1d752l wrote
[removed]
RFC793 t1_j1hbo5x wrote
It was presumed. It was not documented irrefutable fact. This can actually hold up in court vs popular opinion.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments