Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WonderBre4d t1_j5wey32 wrote

Reply to comment by GoArray in 737 Max crashes: Boeing in court on fraud charge by greatdevonhope

You'd have spell it out for me.

It appears to be fine. The article goes in depth on a lot of things.

9

dern_the_hermit t1_j5whw3y wrote

Literally the first thing a person reads is "737 Max crashes".

Given the issue of 737 Max's... y'know... crashing, structuring the headline to lead with that creates the impression that there's been yet another crash involving a 737 Max, instead of this merely being about crashes that already occurred.

8

WonderBre4d t1_j5wihb9 wrote

Yeah.

I took what you said way too literally. I read it as a crashed happened today, not as if it could happen again.

I struggle with it not phrasing as "crashed" or "previously crashed."

Sometimes I think I'm slightly autistic or obtuse.

4