Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

putsch80 t1_j3oeeaw wrote

No, you literally are missing everything. This sentence alone tells me that:

>Diverting ENTIRELY from the fact that odds are good that the first number was accurate towards the damage caused.

Punitive damages aren’t meant to reflect compensation for damage cause. There is an entirely separate class of damages (compensatory damages) which deal with that and which are not covered by any sort of cap or by this judge’s decision. The sole, entire and exclusive province of punitive damages is to punish the tortfeasor, irrespective of the financial amount of damage they caused.

-Signed,

A white man who hates racist assholes, including not only the ones who carry tiki torches in Virginia but also the ones who assume opinions are automatically invalid because they came from a white person.

32

[deleted] t1_j3ofeoq wrote

[removed]

−16

z0nb1 t1_j3ohjlg wrote

What part of punitive vs compensatory damages did you not understand?

18

Thegarbagegamer97 t1_j3oijcj wrote

Dont waste your breath on people like that. Reasoning and logic are beyond their angry irrational brain’s capacity

16

PropChop t1_j3odp3h wrote

Go be pissed at the world somewhere else.

14

[deleted] t1_j3oe4oa wrote

Yes. Because you own this sub and this thread. Narcissism is a hell of a drug homie.

−41