Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mrdilldozer t1_j6lcp89 wrote

Uhh, you are aware of what the lawsuit was about right? It was about ovarian cancer. Did you read the article above? If this case were about breathing in small particles, the makers of Fun Dip would be fucked too. This case is about very specific medical claims. I don't feel sympathy for J&J, but I'm not going to pretend that a jury gets to have the final word on science. I can laugh at them for getting fucked over and read about the evidence at the same time. It's not a binary choice here.

4

damon459 t1_j6lerg2 wrote

I did you said there was no cancer risk, if it causes cancer in the lungs it’s not a huge leap to it’s carcinogenic and therefore causes cancer…

−2

mrdilldozer t1_j6lj40t wrote

> if it causes cancer in the lungs it’s not a huge leap to it’s carcinogenic and therefore causes cancer…

It's a massive leap to say that. There is a ton of evidence about small particles getting trapped in the lungs leading to cellular damage. That causes the cells in the lungs to mutate into cancer. Ovaries don't function the same way your lungs do. It's why not using sunscreen puts you at risk for skin cancer and not pancreatic cancer. Different cancers have different causes.

0

damon459 t1_j6lmg5h wrote

Yeah and asbestos in you talc will cause cancer, get a clue.

−1

mrdilldozer t1_j6ln9u2 wrote

A "wow, thanks for explaining basic things about cancer to me" would have been nice too. Take care, Dunning-Kruger.

2