How is this NOT about Congressman Santos ?

My first thought as well.

Don't worry, he'll be claiming this happened to him in a week

Cuz its canada

Oh great, he's also a Canadian. /s

The officers, meanwhile, claimed during cross-examination to have no recollection of many of the specifics, providing at times ambiguous answers or replying, "I can't speak to that."

-so the officers are guilty AF. This kind of bullshit is practically a signed confession. Hope that are at the very least terminated.

It's a tough job man. Can you imagine having to forget all the details of your job in an instant when the need calls for it?

on the one side, I think the guy literally trying to steal a puppy needs a beat-down, on the other side, cops need to not be those people.

I mean, somebody did already shoot the guy.

Came here for this.

He's King of Canada!

No, no, you got it all wrong.

He founded Canada in 1492 after coming over on the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria with Jesus, George Washington, and Robocop. Together, they pushed out the Mad Max biker gangs that roamed across Canada in its original jungle state. Unfortunately, the weapons they used took a toll and ushered in a new ice age, forming the Great Lakes in just 10 years from glacial slides and killing the last remaining T-rexes in North America, opening the way for American settlement coast-to-coast.

He's laid low for 500 years by joining the Illuminati and putting himself in cryp-sleep, only emerging when the world needs his guidance. He learned this technique by consulting Nostradamus and Leonardo da Vinci (who's alive and well today, going by the name Banksy).

Canada I didn’t expect this to be from y’all lol

I mean, he did shoot a guy stealing a puppy.

The clear message here: law enforcement officials always need to keep their temper in check.

Cut him some slack officer, at least he shot himself.

If you got a problem with Canada puppies you got a problem with me and I'd suggest you let that one marinate.

This is dumb. You don’t stay the original charges, you file new charges against the cop and then the accused felon can sue the police for any damages done by the slap. But, the accused felon should still be held accountable for their crime.

Nice

Do we know he was trying to steal the puppy or is that just what the cops said

"The puppy's owner met with the man outside a Brampton home, when the man allegedly stole the animal at gunpoint."

-so, the victim is the one saying that.

>Two officers were stationed outside the man's hospital roomon the night of his arrest and were relieved by two others in the morning. Theman testified that when he awoke that morning, he asked if he could contact alawyer.According to his testimony, one of the officers replied,"suck a dick." The officer, in his testimony, denied that allegation.
>
>It wasn't until after his surgery around 2 p.m. and after he repeatedly asked for a lawyer, the man testified, that another officer arrived with a cellphone that was used to call his lawyer. The next day, that officer took a statement from the man.
>
>According to the decision, the officer asked if the man told his lawyer about the assault, suggesting he might not want to follow his lawyer's advice — something the judge deemed a breach of solicitor-client privilege.

This is why the charges were dropped. The cops screwed it up so badly that even if there was a conviction, it would likely just get overturned on appeal.