Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TheBounceSpotter t1_j9pvjn2 wrote

Uhmmmm, no. Obviously this phenomenon is evolutionary. Changes in society over the last 100 years have increased the freedom of choice in partners, and the prevalence of pre-marital sex. These are allowing women to weed out most of the lower percentile of size from the pool of men who re-produce. In many cases, men who have come to realize they are well below average, will self select out of the dating pool altogether to avoid the rejection and shame they can expect to face.

−9

NoCommunication4350 t1_j9pywp3 wrote

Like the original article, this is also bullshit. All of this is baseless and designed to get anxiety clicks.

8

barkbangquiet t1_j9q96n1 wrote

i seem to remember just about 2 years ago they said our dicks are getting smaller. now this.

3

Erich-Enrik t1_j9pzpul wrote

wait did you mean to say “anxiety clicks “or “horny chicks”?

1

Page-This t1_j9q75kr wrote

OR top quartile men who have more reproductive success potential realize their opportunity to have multiple partners without having a gaggle of squirts and are extra careful to keep it wrapped…thereby removing themselves from the gene pool. See? Bad logic works both ways…

4

TheBounceSpotter t1_j9qcoa1 wrote

I'm not sure the connection you are trying to make. You didn't address any of the points in my comment, instead stating a fact with an incorrect conclusion. Are the top men having more relations, yes. Do they have the opportunity to be more protected against pregnancy than previous generations, yes. Does them having more relations equal more chances to be sloppy and not fully utilize those protections in the heat of the moment. Also yes. It may not be possible to know the degree, but the general effects are easily modeled.

−1

Page-This t1_j9qqayj wrote

You’ve doubled down…but can you triple?

1

furiousfran t1_j9qau73 wrote

Sorry about your dick

1

TheBounceSpotter t1_j9qbn1p wrote

Interesting that you would assume taking an evolutionary perspective on changes in the population say's something negative about me personally.

0

ErectionDenier2024 t1_j9rcsfc wrote

This reeks of incel.

1

TheBounceSpotter t1_j9rm1uh wrote

I've made a statement of observation, not a judgement. That you interpret it as a judgement speaks more about you than I.

I neither condone, nor condemn, it is simply nature taking it's course. All of evolution has trade offs, gain the ability to walk, lose the ability to breath underwater. While we could argue the tradeoffs about societies current trends, I'll leave that to others.

−2