dubbleplusgood t1_ja30gdn wrote
Was the gun in his pants instead of a holster? Possibly. Regardless of how he carried it, was it locked and loaded? Probably. Did his carelessness and negligence put others at risk? Definitely. Will he learn from his mistake? Absolutely not.
Dances-With-Snarfs t1_ja3mk9c wrote
Guns are carried “locked and loaded” all the time. It’s the preferred way to carry a firearm on the body of somebody who knows what they’re doing. Now carrying it loaded and not knowing what to do with it to the degree that the carrier shoots themself is careless and stupid.
Sudovoodoo80 t1_ja4opxu wrote
Or, hear me out, you could just not live in fear and not carry a gun.
Johnyryal3 t1_ja3rkp6 wrote
Im sure this guy thought he knew what he was doing too.
dubbleplusgood t1_ja3r537 wrote
Locked and loaded, referring to one in the chamber, ready to fire. Cleary he wasn't ready to fire but his firearm was.
Dances-With-Snarfs t1_ja3t6u5 wrote
Yeah I’m well aware. That is how guns are carried. They may have the safety on or off depending on user choice and mechanical function of the firearm. They may have no safety at all. They usually have one in the tube ready to go so the user does not need to rack the slide to put the gun into battery, because if you need a gun you need it right away.
Sudovoodoo80 t1_ja4ouj3 wrote
Or, hear me out, maybe you just don't need the gun.
JesusPotto t1_ja583hy wrote
Wow you sure showed him buddy
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments