Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

restore_democracy t1_jacdg9h wrote

Alternately,

Parents Too Cheap and Lazy to Keep Subscription Updated to Protect Child

−40

assjackal t1_jacg8j6 wrote

Why would you pay for GPS subscription on a vehicle when every phone does it for free?

11

Sputtrosa t1_jadc78w wrote

You don't pay for the gps subscription. You pay for the car to transmit the gps data, since that takes data traffic and isn't free. Using a gps service, however, is free.

1

restore_democracy t1_jaciddb wrote

Guess they should have used their phone.

−21

assjackal t1_jaclib1 wrote

Or, bear with me now, corporate entities shouldn't fuck people over for petty reasons when they have the ability to save an abducted child.

7

WaytoomanyUIDs t1_jaezpe3 wrote

This was the unfortunate and inevitable result of a corporation outsourcing an important function to a 2nd corporation who then outsourced their call center to a 3rd who couldn't be arsed to train their agents.

1

Musicman1972 t1_jacgmcc wrote

Regardless of the parents inaction I feel the community should always do everything they can to find a missing child. Even if it costs corporate $150.

3