Submitted by Byzantium t3_11m0hwv in nottheonion
Comments
N3onknight t1_jbf3p5c wrote
Did they try working the shaft too ?
AliasNefertiti t1_jbf417b wrote
Must have already been plugged in.
Byzantium OP t1_jbf44da wrote
I can imagine the engineers scratching their heads "The spacecraft is not responding to commands."
Intern: "Did you try turning it off and back on again?"
TheKrakenLord t1_jbf5qmv wrote
The old Daddy Pig trick
NohPhD t1_jbf672y wrote
It’s a 15 y/o spacecraft… Sounds like it’s running Windows 3.1
mymar101 t1_jbf76bi wrote
It happens more often than you’d think
jfcmfer t1_jbf7rqn wrote
I just fixed my wifi by doing the same thing! Where do I apply for a job at NASA?
KeaboUltra t1_jbf86ft wrote
Sometimes it's the first thing to try.
M00NGRAPHIX t1_jbfalix wrote
Troubleshooting 101: Did you try restarting?
[deleted] t1_jbfdk69 wrote
[removed]
AutoModerator t1_jbfdkef wrote
Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
mike-godwin01 t1_jbfe5ez wrote
Have you tried reconfiguring the primary power coupling?
ZealousidealGrade821 t1_jbff8ni wrote
I wonder how long they were on hold.
xman747x t1_jbffmyx wrote
in an emergency, it always works for me
Byzantium OP t1_jbfhg2n wrote
I tried Cap'n, but it dinna do a bit of good!
ofalltheshitiveseen t1_jbfiid5 wrote
I.T. here.... This is the way...
Monowakari t1_jbfiol1 wrote
Bet they asked ChatGPT
Lendyman t1_jbfjb1p wrote
15 years ago would be Windows XP! Or Vista. Oof.
Fracture_98 t1_jbfjpq4 wrote
It's very common. A standard feature of inaccessible computer equipment is called a "Watchdog Timer".
The system has a hardware counter that turns the computer off and on again if the timer gets too high. You then write your software so that it resets the timer at regular intervals. If your software crashes, it won't reset the timer and the computer will restart.
It's a bit more complicated than that, but it's really effective.
[deleted] t1_jbfk2y3 wrote
[deleted]
Nazamroth t1_jbfk34g wrote
Have you initiated an unexpected powercycle yet?
HowBoutaLittlePiss t1_jbfk3wd wrote
More lubricant required
KeaboUltra t1_jbfmyiv wrote
It depends on the type of issue but yeah. If you know where the issue might be coming from right away, then you don't have to. It's more of a "have a snickers, you're not you when you're hungry" fix
N3onknight t1_jbfrhg5 wrote
And percussive maintenance
Citizen-Kang t1_jbfuc5q wrote
That's 50% of IT work. "Have you tried turning it off and turning it back on?" I'm a programmer, but I can't even tell you how many times I've asked that when my folks call me about a random computer issue or my wife asks me why such and such isn't working. Most of the time, I'm not at all interested in what the actual problem is, I'm only interested in the resolution.
Guntcher1423 t1_jbg3tb4 wrote
Built by Microsoft, was it?
jimi15 t1_jbg4wuz wrote
Government institutions are always 10 years behind everyone else tech wise. I can believe it.
jfcmfer t1_jbg9obt wrote
Thanks, but I think I'll just wait for them to see my comment and come with an offer. I know my worth!
[deleted] t1_jbhmxhf wrote
[deleted]
mmmmkay23 t1_jbi3omv wrote
Moss and Roy would be proud
[deleted] t1_jbi4yx8 wrote
[removed]
ViciousKnids t1_jbi87ml wrote
As my old man always says: "When in doubt, reboot."
TreyWait t1_jbicbuk wrote
Great moments in IT history.
KiwiObserver t1_jbihsr3 wrote
… read the manual
iwant2dollars t1_jbiyrvq wrote
Not really surprised, it's the most reliable fix
[deleted] t1_jbjy8gd wrote
[deleted]
AquaticRed76 t1_jbjywuv wrote
You joke but "turn it off and on again" happens more often than you'd think at NASA.
Nop277 t1_jblantv wrote
This is also how I stay awake at work.
Temporary_Ideal_2616 t1_jbyc0s0 wrote
It is pretty crazy, but turning thing off and on really is more helpful than it should be.
I used to work on semiconductor machines that were between $20 and $60 million dollars apiece, and I can't tell you how many times turning off the machine and turning it on fixed some whacky problem.
Simon_Drake t1_jc396hu wrote
The New Horizons probe sent out to Pluto had the same CPU as the PlayStation One. Not a CPU of similar performance or using that as a benchmark for comparison, actually the same CPU model used in the PS1. When it launched the PS2 was already out but they like to finalise the hardware years in advance and run extensive tests rather than using cutting edge circuitry.
M00NGRAPHIX t1_jbf3nf0 wrote
When all else fails..