Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

taptapper t1_jbru1rf wrote

>the family would face high costs after the order to rebuild the pub and that this could be taken into account in the fine. “Given the defendants have to rebuild the building, we understand they will have financial burdens in that effect.

Fuck that. they should be bankrupted. What's the point of forgiving the fine because they have to pay for their asshole actions?

56

nolo_me t1_jbs4v73 wrote

You don't think the £1.5m it'll cost will teach them enough of a lesson?

29

jimicus t1_jbtorcv wrote

Probably not, because builders in the UK have a long and proud history of phoenixing to avoid any legal repercussions.

1

UnacceptableUse t1_jbsksfw wrote

If they're bankrupted then who is going to rebuild the pub

24

taptapper t1_jbtd3hi wrote

They weren't going to rebuild the pub, they were going to replace it. The order of fines is: pay to rebuild the pub, then pay the fine. Same as the way everyone does it.

4