Submitted by pirate_republic t3_yhpbcl in nottheonion
GetlostMaps t1_iufuocv wrote
Reply to comment by Free_Breakfast687 in California looking into paying drug addicts to stay sober by pirate_republic
It definitely works with alcohol and with smoking. The science is unequivocal. Also, the sin-tax concept is essentially the same thing in reverse, where you tax something so heavily that there is a significant financial penalty to engage in it. It's also arguable that making dealing drugs more risky and difficult increases the price which decreases use.
Free_Breakfast687 t1_iugjqq1 wrote
This honestly sounds like it only disincentivizes poor people, and doesn't address the root cause. But if you can point me to a source where it was studied, I promise to read it with an open mind.
GetlostMaps t1_iuglx64 wrote
Yes, but as most people are poor people, this has the greatest impact. Something which is targeted to impact the rich logically doesn't change as many people's behaviour. Smokers for example, are predominantly poor.
Free_Breakfast687 t1_iugnavb wrote
I do notice that you haven't linked a source.
GetlostMaps t1_iugwxqn wrote
For which part? Isn't this stuff covered in your high school system?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments