Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

joeri1505 t1_iya0vea wrote

>In this case this doesn't even sound like it would even it make it to a judge before being thrown out.

Soooooo maybe you didn't hear enough on this case and are jumping to conclusions, just like all those people in the McDonalds coffee case?

3

RailwayFox t1_iye2475 wrote

The complaint being it took a few seconds to add the water and a minute for it to sit over the advertised 3.5 minute time is quite different from ridiculously hot coffee caused third degree burns to the genitals

She's claiming false advertisement, whereas with McDonald's they knew about the danger and decided it was cheaper to chance a lawsuit than to serve the coffee at drinkable temperatures where people would have time to take advantage of the free refills

1