Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ransome62 t1_iyt8i0i wrote

Reply to comment by TopGullSenior in Scientists simulate ‘baby’ wormhole without rupturing space and time by TwoMoreDays

First of all whoever downvoted my previous comment is a ducking idiot who dosent understand basic science. 🙄

Secondly what does Elon have to do with this.

You are just looking for a fight. Grow up. Byeeeeee

1

TopGullSenior t1_iytqosw wrote

https://www.thedailybeast.com/spacexs-starlink-is-making-life-hell-for-astronomers-but-telescopes-on-the-moon-could-fix-that

basic science

0

Ransome62 t1_iytrcs5 wrote

Lol wtf does that have to do with me explaining how a quantum computer works?

Your link is about as relevant to this as this one:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulence

Maybe you should study this first before we debate quantum physics....

https://www.askamathematician.com/2009/10/q-how-can-we-prove-that-22-always-equals-4/

1

TopGullSenior t1_iyttmcp wrote

I wasn't saying anything about that. Did I get on your thread? I'm pretty sure you have misunderstood my comment and straight-up attacked while accusing me of argument-baiting, but it could be something else, too. I was the one asking why one scientist or a madman gets to jeopardize the future of an entire sector of the universe when megalomaniacal individuals decide they can do it. You asked me to explain how Elon Musk applied to one individual ruining the planet and I gave you a link. Then I explained how one person ruined night astronomy as an example. Maybe you should try close reading before you argue semantics: https://www.commonsense.org/education/top-picks/resources-for-close-reading-and-literary-analysis-lessons

. First, please try decaf. Also, I accept your apology.

1