Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Racer-Rick t1_j24xg4b wrote

So he agreed to be filmed off the record and discuss a murder he was already convicted of. They used that footage to help show the jury how guilty he was. Unfortunately that’s still a breach of rights. They didn’t need to show it honestly they already had him convicted with prior evidence. Now they may have botched their own death sentence verdict

1

vikingsquad t1_j24z1oc wrote

If you’d read, you’d see there was a no contact order in place such that no one was to have contact with him outside the presence of his lawyers.

2

Racer-Rick t1_j251pve wrote

So that recording was in breach of that? So it’s admissible as evidence? (Ay I got to say a thing)

1

deadocmike t1_j25ckla wrote

Then he should have not talked to a tv show. It’s on him, not the jail or the show. How is this even a debate?

1