Submitted by redlightist t3_10oefma in nottheonion
IAmTheClayman t1_j6iklwk wrote
Reply to comment by DutchNotSleeping in Rick Astley sues Yung Gravy over alleged Never Gonna Give You Up imitation by redlightist
Right, except YG got an interpolation license from the rights holder, which means he was legally allowed to recreate the song. Rick Astley is arguing that just his voice is a separate, protected asset, and that YG was not allowed to imitate it.
In the US at least I’ve never heard of that being a thing, and if it is a thing in UK law I would argue that YG doesn’t sound anything like Rick Astley on his song. He’s singing the same notes, but the tone and quality of his voice sounds nothing like the original
DutchNotSleeping t1_j6ilen9 wrote
The specific recording falls under a seperate copyright, this is 100% true in the US. And it's not about YG imitating his voice, it's about him using the actual recording of RA in the start of this clip.
Here is Legal Eagle explaining something similar with Taylor Swift https://youtu.be/M-A_RrOeoWw&t=4m36s
For some reason the timestamp isn't working properly but the important thing starts at 4m36s
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments