It got a ton of blowback. People hated the plan! But it had no legal protection such as landmarking. If that solution were even available, Pennsy would have fought it. Teardown plans were already being circulated as early as 10 years prior to the actual teardown occurring.

Even today, notable buildings constantly get razed while LPC sits on their hands. And then non-serious proposals for small ugly buildings are put forward constantly by people just looking to lock out neighboring developments, wasting everyone’s time.

I would prefer to see deliberate public planning and architecture. With a serious budget. And with an open mind toward removing obsolete buildings to replace them with modernized versions of what came before it, minus all the ticky tack crap about reusing bricks and beams and what not.