Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

c3p-bro t1_ixrjpt9 wrote

Yea that’s a lot of words to avoid answering a question with a one word response. What was his profession?

8

Lucid108 t1_ixrkcnf wrote

What does his profession have to do specifically with my original post?

5

c3p-bro t1_ixrne1f wrote

I’d ask why you’re avoiding the question but I already know the answer

7

Lucid108 t1_ixrppmm wrote

Right back at ya

3

c3p-bro t1_ixrq6jx wrote

He was a social worker that was supposed to replace the police once they are abolished. It’s extremely relevant to your original comment since that’s the future you want. See? Two can play the strawman game.

3

Lucid108 t1_ixrre0b wrote

So the fact that this occurred the way that it did is meant to invalidate the idea that police need to be defunded and other programs need the resources to combat the social problems that lead to violent outcomes?

2

c3p-bro t1_ixrslb0 wrote

Yes I think the fact that the social workers meant to replace the defunded police are being beat to death in street somewhat invalidates the argument.

You’re not riding around on expensive toys beating people who cross you to death out of desperation or poverty. You’re doing it because you’re garbage who has no place in society.

Defunding the police does not fix these types - they are beyond help. If you think otherwise we fundamentally disagree on this.

I just hope you never find yourself in the same situation he did.

4