mowotlarx t1_j09o8so wrote
If Eric Adams wants to change city culture and innovate he needs to start attracting young and dynamic workers. Hybrid and pay bumps are the way to do it. Period. He doesn't even need to beef up staffing numbers to what they were before, he just needs to make it more appealing to work for the city.
He can only sell out city services to private consultants and lobbyists for so long before everything falls apart.
squall571 t1_j0ceye4 wrote
It’s not just that, a lot of city agencies are behind technology wise. You have many people doing data entry work which can be automated.
D_Ashido t1_j0cfu0b wrote
They are too busy hiring $150/hr consultants to figure out how to bring their tech implementations up to speed.
mowotlarx t1_j0cr3wo wrote
I love when they hire outside consultants to do a quick and shitty job based on their limited understanding and then everyone is stuck with useless data and a garbage project. Happens every time.
mowotlarx t1_j0crexw wrote
Not everything can be automated and a lot should still be quality control checked by human beings. It's really not that simple.
Besides, the city and Adams have expressed zero interest in beefing up technology agencies in the city which would at the bare minimum require them to attract talented workers with flex schedules and better pay, both of which they're unwilling to do.
rioht t1_j0eh6hi wrote
There is almost no chance that the city can attract skilled IT workers, unless it's folks at the beginning of their careers or someone who's only competent on paper.
IT pay is already higher than median pay in the US (55K or so), and IT is an industry where the norm is quickly becoming hybrid schedules (1-2 days a week out).
On top of that, the lack of decent promotional options makes it awful for an IT worker long term. Most IT folks can change jobs every 2-3 years and get a nice salary bump. No such equivalent in the city.
I just don't see how the city can attract IT folks. It's not rational to work for the city.
oddfuture t1_j0da9wo wrote
What is your point?
mowotlarx t1_j0de341 wrote
What part are you having trouble with?
-
Not everything can be automated
-
The city won't spend budget to upgrade equipment
-
The city can't recruit quality IT professionals to manage improvements because they refuse to raise pay and offer hybrid schedules
oddfuture t1_j0dr6zq wrote
I'm having trouble with discerning whether or not you think the current status quo is fine. There are plenty of things that we can and should automate. And we should be investing more into infrastructure and the workforce.
mowotlarx t1_j0dznoz wrote
No, I don't think it's fine. I think the city needs desperately to hire quality talent to make city tech better. But I'm also a realist and know they won't because they refuse to pay good salaries and offer hybrid work.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments