Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

epicxownage t1_j0hxflt wrote

With the news of the law banning the sale of puppies etc in shops, how would this logic not also apply there? Just curious about the broader applications, I do not have a horse in this race

6

freeradicalx t1_j0ihlms wrote

Puppy mills don't grease Albany with lots of lobbying money the way that animal ag does.

8

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j0lxdjy wrote

Also people don't rely on puppies for food. Cruelty in how we treat pets is a lot different from how we secure the food chain.

1

Lost_sidhe t1_j0i7osb wrote

I'd guess (and that's all it is) that if it's a city only ban, then the state has set precedent to overturn it on similar grounds.

3

uncle_troy_fall_97 t1_j0ihqtn wrote

The selling-puppies-in-pet-shops ban is a state law, signed by the governor after some changes were made (like having it take effect in 2024 rather than immediately, for instance). So it is not analogous to this.

5

epicxownage t1_j0iblx4 wrote

Kinda what I was thinking. But, I’m not a lawyer and I don’t care enough to look into it deeper than this surface level question lol

1