Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

actualtext t1_j2mrlm9 wrote

> “Yearslong demolition and construction will destabilize nearby buildings, devastate seniors living adjacent to the massive construction zone, and have vast economic consequences on local business,” Lee added. “These are only a few of the issues that will erase Chinatown off the map.”

Construction noise in a city is not an excuse to prevent a project. It’s got to be the worst excuse you could come up with. I remember hearing a similar excuse being used earlier this year when the MTA needed to pick a location for a new power substation in Manhattan.

4

actualtext t1_j2msf73 wrote

I think it’s possible the current mayor is intentionally trying to bring up the number of detainees in Rikers when he can probably afford to use other means to track them. But it’s also possible that 3000 is not a sufficient capacity/number of beds. Seems like perhaps the thing to do would be to consider additional complementary jails or expansion of the current jails they plan on building to allow for more capacity. The latter might be less feasible given the timeline since that might be a major change to the scope of those construction projects.

Inevitably someone will ask why are they closing Rikers. You can read about it here: https://rikers.cityofnewyork.us/faq/

0

Elevate247 t1_j2mts6k wrote

The people of the South Bronx have dealt with so much already, now they want to build a jail. FOH

7

rabdas t1_j2myadq wrote

4 years of non-stop construction is by no means normal. That’s actually on the quicker timeline. The city is approving 7-10 year long construction to contractors who have no business building such large structures. Private developers build at quicker pace because they can’t afford a property in development for that long.

9

captainktainer t1_j2nfrde wrote

What exactly do you think a jail does? Building a jail more closely integrated with the community will make it much easier to visit family, meet with lawyers, connect with post-incarceration resources, and otherwise do the things that reduce recidivism and improve long-term outcomes. Rikers was a mistake from the very beginning.

−6

Grass8989 t1_j2nivd1 wrote

We should focus on speeding up the courts so someone isn’t waiting 200+ days for their case to be heard.

26

Grass8989 t1_j2noqv4 wrote

I don’t think closing the physical space would matter much, the vast majority of people that are being held on Rikers are being accused of pretty serious crimes. The solution shouldn’t be to release dangerous people pretrial just for a statistic. Speeding up the courts will get people sentenced and sent upstate (or wherever) where they can serve their actual time.

6

MillennialNightmare t1_j2q80kg wrote

Renewable energy projects won’t do anything for mysterious business interests and will make the city more resilient and energy independent which is all positive. Not sure how you can make that sound nefarious but I’m sure you’ll give it a shot.

−2

NetQuarterLatte t1_j2qg2vo wrote

We should build the community jails for the less severe and non-violent crimes. A special focus on the ones who still have a good chance at reintegration and reform.

More severe cases and cases requiring more specialized services should still go to Riker’s.

4