Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

drpvn t1_j5ub64a wrote

> Our main demands are a $50,000 minimum salary, diversity and inclusion language written into our contract . . .

What language specifically?

Maybe they want to address the problem of the disproportionately low percentages of men who work in publishing?

17

Guypussy t1_j5vasgv wrote

>Here’s how to help

As written by an HC employee.

Is that what Prism Reports is? A portal for disgruntled workers to publish their screeds?

−1

bairbs t1_j5vk19s wrote

I think they mean managers are in a different union than the workers. Do the French put both in the same union?

An example would be how teachers have a teachers union and principals have their own

3

TwoCats_OneMan t1_j5vvzfv wrote

This is the worst strike ever. The signs and chanting are generic. Why wouldn't you have what you're striking for and who you're from on the signs?

−3

BakedBread65 t1_j5w1aew wrote

> by returning to a “union shop” system—meaning union contribution responsibilities are shared across all employees hired into union-eligible positions regardless of membership status

So forcing non-Union members to pay towards the union? Fuck that.

4

ViolatedGhost t1_j5w34lk wrote

This is a prime example of how ignorant reddit is. Municipal employees are unionized in most places in the US. And those unions, depending how old, can sometimes be absolute garbage at serving its members.

6

phoenixmatrix t1_j5wlo7i wrote

AFAIK the building they're striking in front of is mostly empty. It's near World Trade and most folks on that street will be tourist taking pictures of the Oculus, and the only people hearing them are probably folks living in the one residential building there.

So pissed off residents sick of listening to the generic chants, and tourists who couldn't give a shit, alongside the 6 employees who actually work from the building.

Whats the point exactly?

I'm also not 100% familiar with the context, but afaik they had a strike last summer and did have a contract. They're just no longer happy with it after 6 months. From an employer's point of view, there's no incentives to give in to the strike since they could give them what they want and then they come back in 6 months with the exact same arguments.

I think unions are a good thing (for most cases. There are exceptions), and fully support strikes, especially for professions that don't have much leverage otherwise, but this one was poorly thought up.

2

sanspoint_ t1_j5zw4id wrote

You have much more in common in your economic needs with the striking workers at HarperCollins than you do with their executives and board members. That's what solidarity is about. All workers deserve good, living wages and working conditions, whether they're working a desk job, operating printing presses, or "just" flipping burgers or collecting trash.

4